Adrian Durham’s piece in the Daily Mail this morning has got Brentford fans’ tongues wagging, as well as their fingers tapping on social media – with the Talksport presenter claiming James Tarkowski (pictured above scoring) was right to refuse to play for Brentford against Burnley on Friday night.
There are few, if any, genuine football fans who would ever agree that one of their team’s players is ever justified in refusing to play because of transfer speculation – and journalists up and down the land must be reading his words and thinking, ‘does he really think that?’ Maybe he does… but I doubt it.
The anti statistical model sentiment than runs through the piece is largely irrelevant – at the end of the day, if you don’t get it, you don’t get it – and the future success of our football club, or otherwise, can’t be gauged now, unless you have a crystal ball of course. Those kind of stories will run and run post-Warburton.
Ironically a couple of years back he slagged Brentford up for being “Loan-ford”- loading our promotion-winning team up with loan players (not quite true and )- then contradicts himself by bigging up the man who was master of our loan strategy – Mark Warburton.
Durham opens his article by saying; “On the face of it, a player refusing to play for his club seems unforgivable…”, which we all know is exactly what it is, unless however you have had a rather public social media spat with the club you are writing about and have been looking forward to writing another highly critical article as soon as the opportunity arose.
Of course, Durham is free to write what he wants, and think what he likes, but, as a Peterborough supporter himself, you would rather hope that he had a firm grasp on the realities of supporting a smaller club and the fans’ expectations whenever one of their better players invariably departs for pastures bigger and better paid.
However, it really is no exaggeration to say that if he’d written the same piece about Wayne Rooney, or Jamie Vardy, and tried to defend those players attempting to hold Manchester United or Leicester to ransom, and in doing so, letting the club’s diehard fans down just before a critical match, no matter who that match was against, it would see laughter and heckles rain down on him. And any popular player, in any team in the world, would see their reputation veer toward public enemy before you could say the words ‘speak to my agent’.
But ultimately, for Durham, that’s just what he wants. He’s a thick-skinned hack that doesn’t mind being laughed at, or having insults thrown his way – or if he does you’d never have guessed. This report is about driving traffic and website hits, but inadvertently, it also gives a fascinating insight into the mindset of somebody who would forgo credibility and respect in preference of a ‘slag me all you like, I don’t care how unpopular I am, it pays my mortgage you mugs’ raison d’être.
Which is probably why Durham respects Tarki’s antics last week so much – he can empathise totally.
In one article Adrian Durham has shown the world how little he really knows about the football business, about genuine football fan culture and ultimately, decent journalism. Still, it pays a little bit more off the new conservatory.
Dave Lane
beesotted100
Nice piece; I often feel the best response to anything written in the D**** M*** is to refuse to acknowledge it in a do-not-feed-the-trolls manner, as that is essentially what drives their revenues (click-baiting misery-peddlers that they are).
The sooner people stop acknowledging, the sooner rags like it will die out, which can only be a good thing for the people of this country (or in the case of The M*** Online, the world).
Here Here. I just read the article. Completely flawed and inaccurate; just what you’d expect from the daily mail. No doubt they will be expressing the complete opposite later on in the year as they always seem to contradict themselves on matters at some point…when it suits them. There was even a suggestion in there that Judgey, who acted with professionalism, had only performed in the second half, the implication (to me) that he’d let Burnley get that lead, then started to show what he was about only when the game was lost.
Firstly, all Adrian Durham is looking for is for people to talk about Adrian Durham.
Secondly, If Tarkowski was right then Brentford would not be allowed to penalise him for his churlish behaviour.
Thirdly, there is no certainty that Tarkowski will finish up at Burnley.
Fourthly, there are few football teams that have seen the success in recent times that Brentford have under the stewardship of Benham. We may all disagree with certain decisions, but overall the facts are that he has achieved outstanding results. During the same period of Benhams ownership of Brentford it would be interesting to see just what Durhams achievements have been – does anyone know, let alone care.
Fifthly, does Adrian Durham support either QPR or Fulham?
Top post Mr Lane
There is an easy rule to follow here:if a writer says “Brentford sacked Warburton etc ” just stop reading as it proves he has not done two minutes’ background research.
Completely agree. I also like that you haven’t linked to the odious article and thereby deprived it of traffic!
Great article Dave, read the original article before yours and you have nailed it.If he couldn’t have mentioned statistics then the article would only be a paragraph long. Unfortunately what happened last season has given lazy journalists thousands of words to use for any article they want to write with a negative slant. He should have just signed off ‘Posh fan’
Good article Mr Lane, perceptive and articulate.
Durham’s entitled to express his opinion, we’re entitled to ignore it.
Very good response to a lazy, fact light, snidey piece of fiction written by someone who gets up in the morning solely to provoke the footballing public. Sadly The Mail is widely read and will be believed by many who see it. That’s why it needs to be countered and corrected. He was “at it” on the radio on Friday night when the news broke – not big and not clever.
AD clearly has a particular problem with BFC and MB. I wonder how he would feel, or what stance the owner of the club that he supports would take, were Tarkowski a Peterborough player? I think we know. And if he has children, what kind of behaviour is he encouraging and passing on to them via his attitude to this?
Football matters very deeply to a lot of people in these Isles of ours, and is emotive and sensitive, not a joke. AD “pulls the pin”, walks away and waits smugly for the explosion and without a care for the consequences. Sure there are a lot of uninformed folk out there who form opinion off the back of SSN and the tabloids – mores the pity.
This was Tarki’s response to Tom Moore at GetwestLondon the day before the Burnley game
“I’m contracted at Brentford for now and playing most weeks. If anything changes I’ll have to deal with it myself. I’ve got 18 months left. I signed a deal to play that long.”
That’s why he and the club needs to explain why that changed. I don’t go for this “Any action will be confidential” crap. Supporters need to know why they were let down.
Top post Mr Lane, the article proves that Mr Durham knows nothing about running a football club like ours. His many mistakes and untruths in the article go to prove that he has not done his background homework on Brentford and what we are all about.
I am a Walsall supporter I don’t agree to blackmail but feel you get what you deserve, you influenced Grigg just when he was ready to sign a 4 year contract with us then tossed him away after all the fuss, and now Smith, give him 5 or 6 matches more and you will want to do the same. It’s football, there is no loyalty in the game, it’s everyone for themselves. Players careers are short so do we blame them for trying to get paid as much as they can, especially when you are not playing in the premier league, they will be set up for life – WHAT WOULD YOU DO. I realize it is only Burnley but they have a chance to get to the Premier. Where teams like us and you can only dream
Nobody is suggesting players shouldn’t move on or be transferred, this issue is about refusing to play, surely even you will agree that isn’t acceptable?
What have we ever done to Walsall to make them so chippy about us, and to defend Durham’s awful piece in the mail?
You will struggle to find one Bees fan who has anything bad to say about Walsall. So we signed Grigg, you were fairly compensated as far as I know, his performances show that he is a decent L1 forward – no more, no less. And if you want to be annoyed at Dean Smith for leaving, fine, but again BFC have behaved correctly throughout. You’ve moved on, are doing well in the division and beat us recently fair and square.
Surely you can see what Tarkowski has done is totally different and plain wrong? And no mate I wouldn’t do it.
Why waste time and energy when you should just be enjoying your football and getting yourselves up to the championship.
Superb summary of what is a farcical piece of ‘journalism’ by Adrian Durham.
Great stuff nail on head stuff Dave.
Loved your guy on the Adrian Durham show today. Game, set and match to him. Durham has two weapons when he is losing the argument – the first is he starts inventing “your lying” taunts (as he did today) and second, and most regular, he brings in his sidekick for an opinion as he simultaneously switches the caller off. I think he is one of the most childish presenters there is – his unwarranted tirades against Arsenal remind me of the cat-wailing arguments I endured in my Primary School playground. Well done your editor – I thought he was superb and stood his ground well.
Thanks Steve, although you can never really win with these guys with their mixing slider… you don’t know what is on and off air when you are talking, but he is so wrong to defend a player’s refusal to pull on a red and white shirt on Friday night. My reason for calling was for him to know I was prepared to tell him to his face rather than write it in the article I wrote earlier. Even he know’s he is wrong.
Spot on steve! !
Offer him a job on Beesotted for a ridiculous fee, and then he would be obliged to stop writing for Mail Online.
Good response to the worst troll of all time writing the worst ever article in the (joint) worst newspaper of all time. I think in the future best just ignore him.
Sorry, this is me… Wrong email details previously.
I have just read the article and the author’s premise, re-justifying “Tarts” not playing is ridiculous and contrived; he is near the mark, with his comments on the gambler and his terrible decision making and cold personality.
went into work today told the boss I didnt feel like working as I had a chance of a better paid job in the near future but would he still pay me. now unemployed is that fair TARKI