As Vic Reeves used to say… “You Just Wouldn’t Let It Lie…” Jim Levack picks at the WarburtonGate wounds and asks if there really is an alternative to simply accepting our owner’s decision to replace Warburton at the end of the season?
As the dust starts to settle on Stat-gate, it’s been a difficult call on whether to write any more about the situation our club might find itself in come May.
Will taking to the laptop make a blind bit of difference? What’s the point of muddying the water? Will my words just p*** people off?
Having left it a while, there’s still something eating away at me about the whole situation that I simply can’t let lie, even if it does mean I’m proven horrendously wrong in the long term.
It’s an issue that has divided opinion like no other. It even sparked a heated exchange between myself and Dave Lane, a bloke I’ve always respected for his partisan Brentford stance and intelligent analysis that have helped us see eye to eye with through the decades to fight common causes.
Friends of many years have sided with either Matthew or Mark and to some extent impartiality has gone out of the window.
The Matthew camp’s main arguments are variously “where would we be without him? Look at the infrastructure he’s put in place. Stat-based scouting works”.
They follow the rationale up with the line that bugs me the most “… and Jim, we’ve got no choice but to trust in him”. Not ideal but true.
The Mark camp meanwhile have a far less scientific defence to their argument, but it’s no less compelling. “Look at the league table, see how he’s managed the squad, the decision to bid him farewell in May is bonkers”.
Since the two camps dug in, I’ve seen several well-placed, intelligent and extremely convincing pieces about the success of stat-led football at Matthew’s FC Midtiylland. The PR machine is grinding into action.
Those features and many of the Beesotted crowd have all got me wondering whether I’m just hopelessly out of touch, behind the times or just hankering after the old Brentford way of doing things. But it’s more complex than that and I’m proud of the fact that I want to question things and don’t sit easily in one camp or the other. [I think the Beesotted interview with Mark Warburton demonstrates how even we have been with our coverage of this saga – DL)
I don’t subscribe to the growing view – perceived or otherwise – that simply because Matthew is owner and benefactor, his decision cannot now be questioned and anyone with doubts is guilty of treason.
I am also equally aware that by airing my reservations, it’s highly possible – given Matthew’s track record – that I’ll be proved hopelessly wrong. I hope I am.
So here’s the rub. I can see why Matthew wants to move towards a more innovative stats-based approach but can also accept why Mark won’t work without the power of veto.
Statistics, as Mark suggested after the Huddersfield game, will struggle to find you young untried talents like Adam Forshaw, George Saville and Marcello Trotta. Only a sound footballing knowledge, awareness of human temperament and old fashioned scouting will find them unless you strike lucky.
A man in charge of coaching footballers who has no power of blocking new signings thrown into what is often a delicate mix of characters and egos is effectively impotent when it comes to key aspects of team building, so who’s job is it to make sure the balance is right?
Mark has taken a tight-knit squad with him this season. His decision not to bring in new faces in January was, as results since have shown, arguably the right one. New people, the wrong people, forced into the mix can have a detrimental effect on those who have worked so hard to achieve so much. The manager is best placed to understand the delicate balance.
The bottom line is that you can be pro-Matthew, the visionary genius or gambling maverick, and pro-Mark, the inspirational man manager or stubborn fool to walk away from something so good. It’s a shame that principles come at such a heavy price.
This week Mark beat Chelsea’s Jose Mourinho to the London Manager of the Year award, an achievement that, disappointingly, barely registered on any of the Brentford fan sites or Twitter.
Did it just pass under the radar or are they tacitly acknowledging now that The Only Way is Matthew? If I’m being overly paranoid and it’s the latter, then it’s a sad day.
The fact is the award Mark and his team won will make us look even more curious to the wider football world – which, in awarding it, offered their opinion on the goings-on at Griffin Park – in two months time.
Winning promotion will make us look stranger still and could prompt Mattthew and Mark to sit down and reach a compromise… well we can all dream, can’t we?
Jim Levack
Bottom line is Benhams a FAN Warbs isnt, everything he does is because of that and not to fleece this football club, how many other clubs can say that, without his financial imput it would have been conference football at best FACT.
Jim, don’t you think it may boil down to something more simple than all this & Mark’s being touted by, & looking into, other job prospects. With his incredible track-record at Brentford, known to be with far smaller resources this season than competitors, no one can blame the other clubs for wanting him; and he’s ambitious. It looks as though MB’s PR spin-doctors are some way behind Warb’s.
I’m ‘gutted’ we can’t continue with the current dream-team, David Weir, MB & MW. Has been an amazing time & they seemed to work it so well together. Just feels that a veto & few other bits wouldn’t be enough to kill it in truth, hence Warbs wanted an escape. Sad for us fans after the crazy-good recent highs we’re lucky to have got a bit used to.
A very cogent analysis.
Also, a debate of the issues is healthy and should not be closed down for fear of logic in opposing views.
There are many examples in football of failed teams assembled without the skills that Warbs possesses – man management and moulding of the individual personalities and football skills into a powerful, effective and successful football team. A team is a complex mix of technical skills and personalities – and statistics are an element in the assembly of the key building blocks, provided they are used wisely – which Benham certainly how to do just that. Warbs is on the key with his expertise and Benham is on key with his statistical approach. The reality is there needs to be a balance – which Brentford seems to have had for a couple of seasons with quite outstanding success.
The second point that should be appreciated is that, yes, Benham owns Brentford Football Club, but a football club is not like a normal corporation. Ownership of a footfall club and all the onerous financial obligations is not for the feint hearted. Clearly what Benham has done for Brentford and the enormous gratitude he is owed is there for all to see, but…..a Football Club is entrenched in the very soul of the community and there are thousands of households and individuals that are emotionally attached to the Football Club, to an extent that does not occur with any other type of corporation. Despite the absolute power he holds over Brentford Football Club Benham should heed this unique responsibility/obligation he has to the Brentford Community. He is in control, he is successful, but he needs Warbs, David Weir and co if he is to be truly successful in the long term and to be consistent with the spirit of 125 years that is unique to Brentford Football Club..
On page 266 of the 125 year Brentford history book it is stated that Benham gave an undertaking in a letter to supporters that he would leave team team selection to others.
Finally, the immediate impact of the announcement of Warbs departure was two losses, one a bad loss. Somehow Warbs has galvanised the players back into a Team. That is a quite unique skill which is invaluable and Benham apparently believes it is dispensable – amazing!!
David. You have put it far better than I. Brilliant response which sums up perfectly the views of a group who I believe may be the silent majority.
All good comments and most supporters I spoken to over 30 think it’s a disgrace that warbs is leaving and been stabbed in the back after the great work he had done ….the younger supporters think it’s crazy but accept it as Benham the owner ….moneyball my arse !
Im sixty three been supporting the bees for fifty years all we have ever had in my time is either owners that are incompetant or try to fleece us, ie Piggot Webb and Noades do you really think hes stabbed Warbs in the back its a bit of a daft comment he gave him the job in the first place.If only warbs was the fan and had the money. SEEMS TO ME ITS WARBS THATS GOING TO WALK AWAY,just sit back and enjoy the ride I know I am
Great piece Jim – glad I’m not the only to express those doubts.
Without taking sides, I wish I could see where the proposed “changes” (note the quotes) exist – as far as I, or anyone else come to that, can see it simply revolves around changing the Gaffer’s title and taking away the veto of player selection.
We are told it is a “new” Euro model – but I wonder if the managers (not Head Coaches) or Barcelona, Real Madrid, Dortmund, Chelsea et al work to this “new” system. I very much doubt that any of them do or would.
I have asked repeatedly for clarification as to what the changes will mean – so far without any satisfactory answer. Until someone does explain how, what and why the changes will benefit the club I will continue to doubt as do you.
Keep up the questioning.
The one thing all these arguments seem to presume Warburton is the ONLY manager with great man management skills. I would like to think there are more people with great man management skills and coaching skills that would fit into the new (well not that new) system.
Hard to find yes but not impossible. And one would like to think Matthew Benham has weighed all of this up.
Also Benham’s ‘new’ system isn’t all statistal modelling. As a press person Jim, I would have thought you would have known how press people try to twist things to suit the story. He has always been an advocate of a mix between traditional methods (why has he spent so much money on an academy?) and stats.
The fact is if Benham told us upfront that he was going to put £90m into the club and his vision was to run it a particular way (sporting director and all), we would have bitten his hand off.
Also, there was nothing to have prevented Warburton leaving for say West Ham in the summer Uwe Rosler style if none of this had come out. They would have paid the 1 year compensation easily. We got off lightly after Rosler left. We had no-one lined up. Warburton was going to interview the new manager them then asked Benham for the job.