Select Page

Benham Makes Personal Statement PLUS New Stadium Visuals

Benham Makes Personal Statement PLUS New Stadium Visuals

Brentford owner Matthew Benham issued a personal statement on Friday afternoon, which outlines his thoughts and rationale for the revised new stadium plans. We have reproduced his statement below, along with the visuals that were available on Thursday evening’s council meeting.

BIAS, BEES UNITED, BEESOTTED & THE GRIFFIN PARK GRAPEVINE are hosting a Fans’ Forum on Saturday between 12:30-2pm at St Paul’s Church Hall, Saint Paul’s Road, Brentford, TW8 0PN where fans will be able to ask Brentford FC directors about the new stadium.

 

 CLICK HERE TO ATTEND  

 

Ahead of the upcoming Fans Forums on 26 August and 7 September, I wanted to take the opportunity to explain why I felt we needed to make some changes to the original plans for our new stadium.

I understand that many of you have been heavily involved over the years, giving a huge amount of your time and energy to help make the original plans a reality. I do not underestimate the importance of this project to everyone involved. It is therefore important to me that I communicate the rationale behind the changes and why they are important.

I have spent a lot of time reviewing the stadium design and associated business plan over the last couple of years. I ultimately reached the conclusion that the original plans were no longer realistic. There was a substantial chance of indefinite delays in the project, which would have tied up many tens of millions of pounds in legal limbo. The amended plan means that, after decades of waiting, a new, modern stadium will be built just a few hundred yards from Griffin Park. This will help push the Club towards a sustainable future.

The original plans were ultimately too risky for the Club to pursue. A complicated build process, for a complex stadium design, on a difficult site to develop, was likely to lead to further delays and further escalating costs and thus endanger successful completion. There was also too much risk associated with a business plan that involved the Club sharing the running of a full-time conferencing and hospitality business with potentially significant start-up costs.

While this original business plan could have been made to work, it was my judgement that there was a significant chance that the business model would fail and saddle the Club with further debt. The Club has no prior expertise in this type of hospitality and I have no desire to build that sort of business in a highly competitive marketplace such as London.

I asked for a review of the stadium design and business plan with specific instructions to de-risk the project. The end result is a stadium that is smaller, has more matchday premium seats, and has a simpler design. I acknowledge that this has resulted in the removal of some of the original elements, such as the Club Shop and pub, and I understand that some fans are concerned that we could end up with a soulless identikit of other stadium designs, so I will address each of these points in turn.

The smaller stadium is a direct result of the need to make the build process more straightforward. While it is a complicated site to develop, I feel it is preferable to have a smaller stadium in Brentford than a much bigger stadium miles away. The smaller capacity still gives significant room for growth in attendances. I have no interest in the Club taking additional risks in the short term to subsidise a hypothetical set of fans who may wish to attend in the future.

It will be possible to increase the stadium capacity in future but, as with the previous design, that expansion would be difficult and expensive. I want to be straightforward and state that I can’t imagine a situation in which the additional investment needed to expand this stadium on this site will be financially justifiable. In my view, the only situation in which a larger capacity would be needed would be if we are in the Premier League. However, in such a circumstance the revenue from ticket sales is a small fraction of the overall revenue that would be available to us.

The increase in premium seats will generate significant additional revenue that will enable us to keep prices at a realistic level for those fans who have been with us through the more difficult times. It will also help us to attract additional sponsorship revenue. There will be a range of prices that will appeal to existing fans, and there will be no shortage of high quality seats in the rest of the ground with much improved facilities compared to Griffin Park.

There will be no Club Shop at the new stadium but there will still be facilities for fans to buy merchandise. These will be distributed around the stadium site, which should make the process of buying merchandise easier for fans and more cost effective for the Club. Our current shop is open almost every day and loses money.

Some fans will be disappointed at a lack of a pub on the site, while for others it won’t be an issue. The smaller scale of the new design, along with the fact that the re-design contains facilities to ensure that it is ready for Premier League football, means that there is no space for a pub in the stadium itself. I hope that one of the benefits of the location of the new stadium is that there are suitable alternatives both in the stadium concourses and locally.

I am absolutely confident that the unique nature of the site will result in a stadium that is still different to the majority of new stadiums, is small enough to create a fantastic atmosphere yet big enough to enable the continued growth of our supporter base and offers a brilliant matchday experience for all fans.

I am fully aware that many fans would have liked to be consulted on the changes to the plans. In my opinion, it would make sense to consult only when such a consultation would be meaningful. In this instance, my concerns over the risks of the stadium build and business model took overwhelming precedence over a consultation which would not have ultimately impacted on what needed to be done. In addition, there were commercial sensitivities and confidential negotiations that needed to take place which meant that the full facts would not have been available ahead of any consultation.

I also want to acknowledge the concerns of many fans who have raised questions about how the Club will generate revenue to sustain itself in the long term and past my ownership. If and when the time comes that I am no longer involved with the Club, I will ensure that there is a business plan in place that offers long-term financial stability and the opportunity to continue to grow and achieve success on the pitch.

Football continues to change so it is impossible to predict what business model would make the Club fully sustainable at any point in future. It is important to note that the business plan associated with the original stadium design would not have been enough to sustain the club with the current Championship wage bill. As it stands, the only way to be truly sustainable is to be in the Premier League. The new stadium design is completely aligned with our Premier League ambition, will yield important additional revenues that move us towards sustainability, and will not involve the Club taking unnecessary business risks. We will continue with a transfer policy which will help to fill the rest of the funding gap.

I’d like to thank all fans for their continued support as we strive towards our ultimate goal of a new stadium in Brentford and a bright long-term future.

Matthew Benham

MORE RECENT CONTENT

MOST READ CONTENT

Where Is It All Going Wrong At Brentford?

Two more games played. Still no wins. Things are starting to get desperate. After a 1-1 draw against Reading - where Brentford should have had the game wrapped up after 45 minutes - the Bees put out a much-changed side against Norwich and were well and truly turned...

read more

Brentford FC 4,000th Game – The Video

  Brentford celebrate a wonderful landmark this weekend, with the home fixture against Barnsley marking the club’s 4,000th League game. Beesotted have produced this video to mark the occasion, using images from throughout the club’s proud history, which give a...

About The Author

Dave Lane

Beesotted Editor Since 1990

5 Comments

  1. BORU

    The changed, dropped rooflines, will produce variable wind patterns and gusts on the pitch; thus will impact on play.
    The rugby games, will chop up the turf.
    The social elements within the ground, pub, conference facilities and shop, have now been abandoned.
    The safe standing potential appears to be much lowered. The standing area, is currently the heart of BFC vociferous support during games.
    Stadium seems to be leaking any personality it ever had in the original plans.
    Otherwise, all great.

    Reply
  2. BORU

    “Problem gambling grows by 50% in three years” (The Times Friday August 25 2017.
    Official figures state that the scale of the gambling epidemic sweeping Britain, has grown to 430,000 people in the UK, with serious gambling problems, with all the social , family and personal misery that this involves; a rise from 280,000 in 2012.
    The financing of Brentford FC, is implicitly based on gambling.
    Gambling is a social cancer.

    Reply
    • hobo

      SAY WHAT YOU REALLY WANT” BENHAM OUT”.please cut out the waffle Brian.

      Reply
      • BORY

        I care about the club, not some nonentity investor

        Reply
        • hobo

          So do i Brian ,55 years worth of caring , with the club having little or no money and the Bees playing mediocre football at best in the lower leagues.

          Reply

Leave a reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Twitter

Podcasts

Beesotted Man Of The Match

Ryan Woods – 1
Josh Clarke – 1
Kamo Mokotjo – 1
Ollie Watkins – 1
Yoann Barbet – 1
Romaine Sawyers – 1

Beesotted Archive

STATS

Latest football scores live. Includes soccer fixtures, table & results.

Bees News Now